“METHODS OF TEACHING.
In 1817, Jonathan Ware, of Albany, addresses a memorial to the Senate, relating to an improved mode of teaching the languages, which was referred to the Regents for examination. Their committee, after making inquiries, and observing the result in different examinations in French classes, reported, that in their opinion, ‘the system of teaching practiced by him is superior to the ordinary course pursued in the generality of schools in this State. The method adopted by Mr. Ware resembles that of Dufiet: it consists in teaching the proper names of things, and short familiar sentences in the first instances, and leaves grammatical instruction until the pupil is proficient in the art of speaking and understanding the language. This is the natural course, and its advantages are illustrated by the examinations referred to.’
They had however no pecuniary patronage to bestow for rewarding individuals for discovering new and successful modes of instruction, however meritorious, and therefore simply reported as above.
Upon the 11th of April 1817, the Senate committee reported to the effect, that it appeared that Mr. Ware’s method was a new and valuable improvement in the education of youth, and they recommended him as deserving of deserving encouragement and patronage.”
Reference Data:
Historical and Satistical Record of the University of the State of New York, 2885, pages 505-6

Great article. Which goes to show lawmakers that someone who is involved with his/her vocation every day, has more knowledge of how it should be done. Therefore, have the right to improve upon the methods used. There is always a way to build a better mousetrap.
C. Wayne Ware
Cedar Falls, IA